Downsizing Is Dead

Congress finally passed the housing bill aimed at increasing America’s housing supply. That’s good news. We need more homes, and builders need every tool they can get.

But I think it’s focused on only half the problem.

Everyone is asking how many new homes we’ll build. Yet there’s another question the bill doesn’t answer. What home owners are going to sell the homes we already have?

For decades, the housing industry relied on a fairly predictable cycle. Young families bought larger homes. The kids grew up. They left for college or started families of their own. Mom and dad downsized, freeing up inventory for the next generation.

I think that model is dead.

I’ve been waiting for the great downsizing wave for years. (You have too, probably) It hasn’t happened, and I’m starting to think we’ve misunderstood what drives people to move.

The Generation X File

Members of Generation X, who were born from 1965–1980, are approximately 46–61 years old. These geezers (myself included) are now entering their empty-nest years, yet aren’t behaving like previous generations.

Many of these homeowners bought before the pandemic housing boom and refinanced into historically low mortgage rates. They have substantial equity, manageable monthly payments, and very little financial incentive to trade a 3% mortgage for one that’s twice as expensive.

Thirty years ago, an empty bedroom represented wasted space. Today it might be a home office, a gym, a guest room, an Airbnb, or, more likely, a bedroom for an adult child who moved back home. Many Gen X homeowners are also helping aging parents while still supporting their own children. The house hasn’t become less useful. In many cases, it’s become more useful.

That’s why I think the word downsizing has outlived its usefulness.

Generation X will move, eventually. The question is what finally causes them to move.

For previous generations, the answer was often simple: the kids left home. Today, I don’t think that’s enough. Selling is more likely to follow a major life event, retirement, divorce, a health change, the arrival of grandchildren, caring for aging parents, or relocating for work. The empty nest may no longer be the catalyst. It’s just another milestone along the way.

If true, this has slowly been changing the inventory equation.

If homeowners stay in place five or even ten years longer than previous generations, the flow of existing homes onto the market slows dramatically. Congress can encourage builders to create more supply, and that’s an important step,but no legislation can create the life events that ultimately convince someone it’s time to sell.

Housing supply has always depended on two pipelines. One is new construction. The other is existing homeowners deciding to move. The new housing law addresses the first pipeline. The second will be driven by demographics, family dynamics, and human behavior.

I suspect the industry’s biggest forecasting mistake over the next decade won’t be misjudging mortgage rates or construction starts. It’ll be assuming that empty nesters behave the way they always have.

Downsizing isn’t disappearing off the map, but it’s no longer the default. The next generation of listings won’t be created because the kids moved out. They’ll be created because life moved on.

And if that’s true, the housing industry needs to rethink where tomorrow’s inventory will actually come from.